Can An Sti Cause Kidney Stones?

THE WORLD VERTICAL II

THE FREE MARKET DEMYTHOLOGIZATION

Capitalist ideology has been so embedded in the consciousness, which passes unnoticed in speech and in the findings, the only way defeat from the everyday, is opposed to individual strength and antisocial, the argument which we do things, resolve problems and seeks the common good in mind tod @ s, there is still no thanks ingratitude nothing and also thank you, despite the efforts of a revolution strive social health of men and women who journeyed today This fleeting moment, just a bit of life, after all, we have the right to end all existence in an attempt to satisfy the wishes immeasurable and endless advertising offers us? we are entitled, just a generation or two, all-consuming, to exhaust all as if we were really important? important everyone, and requires that everyone aspires to the same levels of accumulation and comfort that the bad example of the north has given us? How many cars and highways will necessary, as many industries and devastated forests are essential to sustain the thoughtless folly of those who defend capitalism? Could it be that by the sheer brutality, ignorance and ambition will be sentenced next generations to live in mountains of garbage?

is it that we will be useless as they increasingly automate our lives? Will then be that the machines and industrialization continue to condemn us to futility? Professions continue to classes, in impoverished and privileged?, perhaps we continue admiring stars of Rock, Pop Rap or reggeton, or orchestras, while we forget our music? unhappiness and dissatisfaction will continue trading from the imaginary who sold us the free market or I explained to the people to which it aspires not possible? Will it still be "Development" "Quality of Life" the slogans that we will continue flying even in revolution, or else we focus on thought and constructed as a people, from below, without having to waiting for orders from above, without further conviction to believe in ourselves and aware enough to know that we can take our homes, our drinks, planted in the courtyards of the houses and schools.

is now clear that the food crisis is due to factors of monopolization of the great pools of fast food, the consumption increases meat, or the Westernization of consumption patterns of China and India for example, another factor that significantly influences are "biofuels" huge amounts of hectares to feed the cars, the same traffic and collapsing cities, large quantities of maize crop to be in such a bizarre waste of energy and resources, when you know that only the corn, taking 60% of nutrition, beta carotene, vitamins of the series B, with antioxidant, anticarcinogenic, and many other benefits, could easily ensure good global power, because if a person is fed throughout the year just from corn, not die of hunger and malnutrition much less.

Cities In nothing is produced, at least in our case, if there was a bombing or a foreign intervention, these human clusters succumb to week or would have to leave the field because everything comes from the field, leading to the farmer, when we talk about food sovereignty, there is talk that the same people who inhabit urban land has to practice the types of agriculture and seed adapted to that environment, can ensure sustainability and real sovereignty, unfortunately people believe or trust the supermarkets and shopping centers because a vast majority succumbing to the comfort and happiness that supposedly offered through it, an element of conditioning, and therefore of neo-slavery that have failed to exploit the capitalists. (The middlemen of all kinds and branches of the economy).

How about if we sow in our homes? What if we started growing sprouts? What if we create a culture of good food, if we knew the properties of plants, the functions of each food and their properties healing and energizing?

Will you need the cars, for transport by post? What if we thought in cities for people rather than cities for business? Can a society where riding a bike? how would it be? have to travel long distances, be in a hurry, running over the other to get on the subway? "or rather , would be close to where people live, so do not have to migrate en masse? we continue collapsing cities of people, buildings and houses, or we distribute the best in the area? What is smarter, solve a problem apparently, to reappear later with more complexity, or solve the underlying problem to keep the disaster from happening again?

The Crisis of capitalism and free market occurs, and people are pissed at first to notice: the dissatisfaction of desires that the free market offers, and can not be achieved, then come to light fraudsters, merchants of hunger, disease entrepreneurs, but you have to explain and make clear is that the resources of this planet are not enough to satisfy those desires that sells and installs on each imaginary free market, taking into account the world population will reach to meet needs, which is food, clothing and staying in good shape, physically, psychologically and spiritually, but not for every person who possesses as many times chimeras billionaires boast and pride of the magnates, it is not possible and are only illusions that confuse us and make us fall into the trap of competition, this alleged habit of putting money ahead of all things, and justify the gain detriment of others through any means, any trick or device.